Compare

Port, 18.5 vol% vs Cider, 6.2 vol%: nutrition comparison

Per 100 g: 148 kcal for Port, 18.5 vol%, versus 63 kcal for Cider, 6.2 vol%, a difference of 85 kcal. The full breakdown, nutrient by nutrient, from the FSVO database V7.1.

Port, 18.5 vol%

Wine100 g

Protein0.2 g 0.2 g

Fat0 g 0 g

Vitamin D0 µg 0 µg

Omega-30 g 0 g

Energy148 kcal 148 kcal

Protein+0.2 g

Fatequal

Vitamin Dequal

Omega-3equal

Energy+85 kcal

Cider, 6.2 vol%

Wine100 g

Protein0 g 0 g

Fat0 g 0 g

Vitamin D0 µg 0 µg

Omega-30 g 0 g

Energy63 kcal 63 kcal

Highest sugars content

Port, 18.5 vol% contains 4.5 g more sugars per 100 g.

Highest energy content

Port, 18.5 vol% contains 85 kcal more energy per 100 g.

Highest magnesium content

Port, 18.5 vol% contains 5 mg more magnesium per 100 g.

Full comparison, nutrient by nutrient

Per 100 g. In green: the higher of the two contents. “n/a”: not available in the source.

Per 100 g	Port, 18.5 vol%	Cider, 6.2 vol%
Macronutrients
Energy	148 kcal	63 kcal
Protein	0.2 g	0 g
Fat	0 g	0 g
of which saturated fat	0 g	0 g
of which polyunsaturated	0 g	0 g
of which omega-3	0 g	0 g
Carbohydrates	11.7 g	7.2 g
of which sugars	11.7 g	7.2 g
Dietary fibre	0 g	0 g
Water	70.2 g	85.2 g
Alcohol	14.4 g	4.9 g
Minerals
Calcium	7 mg	5 mg
Iron	0.4 mg	0.3 mg
Magnesium	9 mg	4 mg
Phosphorus	12 mg	9 mg
Potassium	73 mg	95 mg
Sodium	9 mg	2 mg
Zinc	0.3 mg	0.2 mg
Vitamins
Vitamin D	0 µg	0 µg
Vitamin B12	0.1 µg	0.1 µg
Vitamin C	0 mg	traces
Folate	1 µg	1 µg

Port, 18.5 vol% vs Cider, 6.2 vol%: nutrition comparison

Port, 18.5 vol%

Cider, 6.2 vol%

Full comparison, nutrient by nutrient

Keep comparing