Skip to content

Compare

Pork, filet, pan fried (without addition of fat and salt) vs Pork, chuck, roast, raw: nutrition comparison

Per 100 g: 153 kcal for Pork, filet, pan fried (without addition of fat and salt), versus 181 kcal for Pork, chuck, roast, raw, a difference of 28 kcal. The full breakdown, nutrient by nutrient, from the FSVO database V7.1.

Protein29.3 g 29.3 g
Fat4 g 4 g
Vitamin D0.8 µg 0.8 µg
Omega-30 g 0 g
Energy153 kcal 153 kcal
Omega-3equal
Protein24.6 g 24.6 g
Fat9.2 g 9.2 g
Vitamin D0 µg 0 µg
Omega-30 g 0 g
Energy181 kcal 181 kcal
Highest zinc content

Pork, chuck, roast, raw contains 2.5 mg more zinc per 100 g.

Highest phosphorus content

Pork, filet, pan fried (without addition of fat and salt) contains 130 mg more phosphorus per 100 g.

Highest vitamin D content

Pork, filet, pan fried (without addition of fat and salt) contains 0.8 µg more vitamin D per 100 g.

Full comparison, nutrient by nutrient

Per 100 g. In green: the higher of the two contents. “n/a”: not available in the source.

Per 100 gPork, filet, pan fried (without addition of fat and salt)Pork, chuck, roast, raw
Macronutrients
Energy153 kcal181 kcal
Protein29.3 g24.6 g
Fat4 g9.2 g
of which saturated fat1.6 g1.9 g
of which polyunsaturated0.3 g0.7 g
of which omega-30 g0 g
Carbohydrates0 g0 g
of which sugars0 g0 g
Dietary fibre0 g0 g
Water66.8 g62.9 g
Alcohol0 g0 g
Minerals
Calcium10 mg8 mg
Iron1.7 mg1.3 mg
Magnesium30 mg23 mg
Phosphorus270 mg140 mg
Potassium350 mg260 mg
Sodium150 mg68 mg
Zinc2.8 mg5.3 mg
Vitamins
Vitamin D0.8 µgtraces
Vitamin B120.8 µg0.9 µg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Folate5 µg3 µg