Compare

Rusk vs Wholemeal rice waffles with sweet coating: nutrition comparison

Per 100 g: 421 kcal for Rusk, versus 500 kcal for Wholemeal rice waffles with sweet coating, a difference of 79 kcal. The full breakdown, nutrient by nutrient, from the FSVO database V7.1.

Rusk

Crispbreads, rusks, crackers and wafers100 g

Protein11.6 g 11.6 g

Fat7.8 g 7.8 g

Vitamin D0 µg 0 µg

Omega-30 g 0 g

Energy421 kcal 421 kcal

Protein+5.5 g

Fat−16.1 g

Vitamin Dequal

Omega-3equal

Energy−79 kcal

Wholemeal rice waffles with sweet coating

Crispbreads, rusks, crackers and wafers100 g

Protein6.1 g 6.1 g

Fat23.9 g 23.9 g

Vitamin D0 µg 0 µg

Omega-30.1 g 0.1 g

Energy500 kcal 500 kcal

Highest saturated fat content

Wholemeal rice waffles with sweet coating contains 13.1 g more saturated fat per 100 g.

Highest fat content

Wholemeal rice waffles with sweet coating contains 16.1 g more fat per 100 g.

Highest magnesium content

Wholemeal rice waffles with sweet coating contains 57 mg more magnesium per 100 g.

Full comparison, nutrient by nutrient

Per 100 g. In green: the higher of the two contents. “n/a”: not available in the source.

Per 100 g	Rusk	Wholemeal rice waffles with sweet coating
Macronutrients
Energy	421 kcal	500 kcal
Protein	11.6 g	6.1 g
Fat	7.8 g	23.9 g
of which saturated fat	1 g	14.1 g
of which polyunsaturated	4.4 g	1.2 g
of which omega-3	0 g	0.1 g
Carbohydrates	74.6 g	63.6 g
of which sugars	14.2 g	30.5 g
Dietary fibre	2.9 g	3.4 g
Water	4 g	2.8 g
Alcohol	0 g	0 g
Minerals
Calcium	39 mg	90 mg
Iron	1.4 mg	2.4 mg
Magnesium	33 mg	90 mg
Phosphorus	140 mg	240 mg
Potassium	210 mg	440 mg
Sodium	500 mg	180 mg
Zinc	1.1 mg	2 mg
Vitamins
Vitamin D	0 µg	0 µg
Vitamin B12	0 µg	0 µg
Vitamin C	0 mg	1 mg
Folate	21 µg	12 µg

Rusk vs Wholemeal rice waffles with sweet coating: nutrition comparison

Rusk

Wholemeal rice waffles with sweet coating

Full comparison, nutrient by nutrient

Keep comparing